Urban Deterioration and the Production of Internal Peripheries: Symbolic Dispossession in Valparaiso’s (Chile) Heritage Sector

Authors

Abstract

This study examines the role of urban deterioration in the production of internal peripheries within central heritage contexts, taking the Puerto de Valparaíso sector as a case study. Through a mixed-methods approach that combines spatially referenced interviews and on-site surveys, the research analyzes residents’ perceptions, practices, and experiences regarding deteriorated spaces. The findings show that urban deterioration cannot be understood solely as physical obsolescence, but rather as a socially produced process that articulates material, symbolic, and psychosocial dimensions. Within this framework, evidence of internal peripheralization emerges, where the sector’s geographical centrality contrasts with its functional, symbolic, and emotional exclusion. Deterioration operates as a mechanism of symbolic dispossession, generating an ambivalent experience in which identity attachment coexists with disaffection and insecurity. At the same time, horizons of re-signification emerge from community expectations of recovery and collective uses of degraded spaces. The study concludes that urban revitalization and heritage policies must incorporate residents’ subjective and psychosocial experiences, advancing toward a framework of spatial justice.

Keywords:

urban deterioration , internal peripheralization , symbolic displacement , urban exclusion , Valparaíso (Chile)

Author Biographies

Hector Berroeta, Universidad de Valparaíso

Doctor en Espacio Público y Regeneración Urbana, Universidad de Barcelona.
Director alterno Centro de Investigación de Vulnerabilidad e Informalidad Territorial (CINVIT) Universidad de Valparaíso.
Director Departamento de Psicología Social, Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile.

Jorge Ulloa-Martínez, Universidad Viña del Mar

Doctor en Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la Frontera.
Académico investigador de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas, Sociales y de la Educación de la Universidad Viña del Mar. Investigador asociado del Centro de Investigación de Vulnerabilidad e Informalidad Territorial (CINVIT) Universidad de Valparaíso.

References

Adán, J. (2008). La gestión del patrimonio cultural en Chile: problemas, hipótesis centrales y metodología de la investigación. En P. Andueza (Ed.), El patrimonio cultural como factor de desarrollo en Chile. Bases teóricas y metodológicas de una gestión con enfoque ecosistémico (pp. 13-32). Universidad de Valparaíso.

Anokhin, A. A. y Kuzin, V. Y. (2019). Approaches to identifying the periphery and peripheralization in the space of modern Russia. Regional Research of Russia, 9(4), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519040026

Bachmann-Vargas, P. y van Koppen, C. S. A. (2020). Disentangling environmental and development discourses in a peripheral spatial context: The case of the Aysén Region, Patagonia, Chile. The Journal of Environment & Development, 29(3), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496520937041

Bernt, M. y Colini, L. (2013). Exclusion, marginalization and peripheralization: Conceptual concerns in the study of urban inequalities. Institut für Regionalentwicklung und Strukturplanung. (Working Paper 49). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/228579

Berroeta, H. y Vidal, T. (2012). Una propuesta multimétodo para un abordaje transaccional del espacio público en la escala de barrio. Athenea Digital, 12(1), 209-237. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v12n1.927

Braun, V. y Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.

Cáceres Seguel, C. (2019). Turismo, gentrificación y presión por desplazamiento en los cerros Concepción y Alegre de Valparaíso. Revista INVI, 34(97), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582019000300157

Cáceres Seguel, C. (2023). Valparaíso: Touristification and displacement in a UNESCO city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 46, 1192–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2203400

Cáceres Seguel, C. (2024a). Valparaíso patrimonio Unesco: Turistificación dirigida por el Estado y las voces de un ciclo urbano en disputa. Punto Sur, 11. https://doi.org/10.34096/ps.n11.14331

Cáceres Seguel, C. (2024b). Valparaíso y el ciclo urbano pos-Unesco 2003-2022: Turistificación, patrimonio, y configuración de un espacio urbano elitizado. EURE, 50(151). https://doi.org/10.7764/EURE.50.151.01

Caimanque, R. (2019). The politics of urban regeneration: The construction of uneven urban agendas through multi-scalar coalitions in Valparaiso [tesis de doctorado]. University College London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10071565/

Caimanque, R. (2023). The life and death of the ‘Baron mall’: The shifting politics of urban regeneration in Valparaiso. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(5), 884-902. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544231163072

Caldeira, T. (2000). City of walls: Crime, segregation and citizenship in Sao Paulo. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520341593

Copus, A., Mantino, F., y Noguera, J. (2017). Inner peripheries: An oxymoron or a real challenge for territorial cohesion? Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 7(1). https://ijpp.dicam.unitn.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2-Copus-et-al-2017-1.pdf

Coulomb, R. y Schteingart, M. (2006). Entre el Estado y el mercado: La vivienda en el México de hoy. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Creswell, J. y Plano-Clark, V. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

De Biaggi, G. D. (2024). ‘Security’ and private governance in São Paulo’s corporate centrality frontier. Urban Studies, 61(14), 2817–2834. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241227148

de Certeau, M. (2010). La invención de lo cotidiano. 1 Artes de hacer. Universidad Iberoamericana.

Di Masso, A., Berroeta, A., Pradillo, H., y Aleu, C. (2022). Gentrificación y desposesión de lugar: dinámicas subjetivas del desplazamiento simbólico y la micro segregación. Anuario de Psicología, 52, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1344/ANPSIC2022.52/1.12

Di Virgilio, M. y Perelman, M. (Coords.). (2021). Desigualdades urbanas en tiempos de crisis. Ediciones UNL/Flacso.

El Bouaaichi, A. (2013). Territorial assessment of the urban peripheries fragmentation in Fez, Morocco. ARCC Conference Repository. https://arcc-journal.org/index.php/repository/article/view/120

Escolà-Gascón, Á., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., y Denovan, A. (2024). Abandoned vs. regenerated places: Evidence of five social impacts that improve urban planning. Cities, 146, 104739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104739

Falk, M. y Hagsten, E. (2023). A management perspective on threats to cultural world heritage sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29(3), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2176348

Falk, M. y Hagsten, E. (2024). Factors with ambiguous qualities for cultural world heritage sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 66, 384-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.12.009

Fetters, M. D. y Tajima, C. (2022). Joint displays of integrated data collection in mixed methods research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221104564

Fischer-Tahir, A. y Naumann, M. (Eds.). (2013). Peripheralization. The making of spatial dependencies and social injustice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1

Flick, U. (2007). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Morata.

Gerundo, R., Nesticò, A., Marra, A., y Carotenuto, M. (2020). Peripheralization risk mitigation: A decision support model to evaluate urban regeneration programs effectiveness. Sustainability, 12(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198024

Harvey, D. (2013). Ciudades rebeldes: del derecho de la ciudad a la revolución urbana. Akal.

Hidalgo Dattwyler, R., Santana Rivas, L. D., y Link, F. (2019). New neoliberal public housing policies: Between centrality discourse and peripheralization practices in Santiago, Chile. Housing Studies, 34(3), 489–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1458287

Hodgetts, D. J., Stolte, O., Chamberlain, K., Radley, A., Groot, S. y Nikora, L. W. (2010). The mobile hermit and the city: Considering links between places, objects, and identities in social psychological research on homelessness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X450465

Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City & Society, 21(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2009.01024.x

Hosseini, K., Stefaniec, A., y Hosseini, S. P. (2021). World heritage sites in developing countries: Assessing impacts and handling complexities toward sustainable tourism. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 20, 100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100616

Howe, L. B. (2022). Processes of peripheralisation: Toehold and aspirational urbanisation in the GCR. Antipode, 54(6), 1803–1828. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12844

Ilan, J. (2013). Street social capital in the liquid city. Ethnography, 14(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138112440983

Inostroza, L. (2017). Informal urban development in Latin American urban peripheries. Spatial assessment in Bogotá, Lima and Santiago de Chile. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.021

Jang, H. y Mennis, J. (2021). The role of local communities and well-being in UNESCO world heritage site conservation: An analysis of the operational guidelines, 1994–2019. Sustainability, 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137144

Jones, T. E., Bui, H. T., y Ando, K. (2022). Zoning for world heritage sites: Dual dilemmas in development and demographics. Tourism Geographies, 24(1) https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1780631

Kearns, A., Ghosh, S., Mason, P., y Egan, M. (2020). Urban regeneration and mental health: Investigating the effects of an area-based intervention using a modified intention to treat analysis with alternative outcome measures. Health & Place, 61, 102262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102262

Kühn, M. (2015). Peripheralization: Theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518

Lefebvre, H. (2013). La producción del espacio. Capitán Swing.

Martland, S. J. (2008). Trade, progress, and patriotism: Defining Valparaíso, Chile, 1818-1875. Journal of Urban History, 35(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144208321876

Martone, V. y Nicola, C. (2021). La costruzione sociale dello spazio in una frontiera urbana di Roma. Marginalizzazione, criminalità e politiche di sicurezza a Montespaccato. Fuori Luogo, 9(1), 148-160.

Massey, D. (2005). For space. Sage.

Meskell, L. (2019). Heritage, gentrification, participation: Remaking urban landscapes in the name of culture and historic preservation. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(9), 996-998. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1542334

Muñoz, A. y Goecke, C. (2025). Comunicación, valoración y responsabilidad social en el deterioro del Sitio Patrimonio Mundial de Valparaíso. EURE, 51(153), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.7764/EURE.51.153.07

Ndlebe, T. A. (2017). Assessing the impacts of urban decay on the residential land-uses [masters degree]. University of KwaZulu-Natal). http://hdl.handle.net/10413/15866

Neumann Novack, P. (2019). Expresiones del neoliberalismo en ciudades portuarias sudamericanas: Los casos de Rosario (Argentina) y Valparaíso (Chile). Cultura-Hombre-Sociedad, 29(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.7770/cuhso-v29n2-art2050

Oppido, S., Ragozino, S., y Esposito De Vita, G. (2023). Peripheral, marginal, or non-core areas? Setting the context to deal with territorial inequalities through a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310401

Pan, Y. y Cobbinah, P. B. (2023). Embedding place attachment: Residents’ lived experiences of urban regeneration in Zhuanghe, China. Habitat International, 135, 102796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102796

Salgado, V., Friel, S., Fotso, J. C., Khadr, Z., Meresman, S., Monge, P., y Patil-Deshmukh, A. (2011). Social conditions and urban health inequities: Realities, challenges and opportunities to transform the urban landscape through research and action. Journal of Urban Health, 88(6), 1183–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9609-y

Seidel, A. (2022). How to narrate urbicides? Lidija Ginzburg’s and Miron Białoszewski’s portrayals of urban destruction. University of Bucharest Review Literary and Cultural Studies Series, 12(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.31178/UBR.12.1.3

Silver, J. (2021). Decaying infrastructures in the post-industrial city: An urban political ecology of the US pipeline crisis. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(3), 756-777. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619890513

Tiznado-Aitken, I., Vecchio, G., Guzman, L. A., Arellana, J., Humberto, M., Vasconcellos, E., y Muñoz, J. C. (2023). Unequal periurban mobility: Travel patterns, modal choices and urban core dependence in Latin America. Habitat International, 133, 102752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102752

Toro, A. M., Link, F., y Valenzuela, F. (2017). Arriendo en propiedad: Arraigo y vulnerabilidad residencial en el barrio puerto de Valparaíso. Revista INVI, 32(90), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582017000200127

White, B. T., Sepe, S. M., y Masconale, S. (2014). Urban decay, austerity, and the rule of law. Emory Law Journal, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2230652

Whitney, R. A. y Sotomayor, L. (2025). Peripheral best practices and the politics of visibility: Urban planning and social urbanism in Mexico City. Cities, 158, 105667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105667

Yang, K. y Banamah, A. (2014). Quota sampling as an alternative to probability sampling? An experimental study. Sociological Research Online, 19(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3199

Zaslavskaya, A. y Evstratova, E. (2024). Principles of revitalization of peripheral urban areas. Innovative Project, 8(14), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.17673/ip.2023.8.14.4

Zukin, S. (2010). Naked city. The death and life of authentic urban places. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195382853.001.0001