El presente documento examina la relación entre los puentes peatonales de la ciudad de Chihuahua, México, y el número de peatones atropellados en sus inmediaciones. El análisis inició con la evaluación de la caminabilidad en los entornos en donde se ubican los puentes peatonales; posteriormente se utilizaron sistemas de información geográfica para la geolocalización de casos de atropellamientos en el periodo 2015-2020 y se realizó un análisis multivariante utilizando algoritmos genéticos. Los resultados obtenidos evidenciaron que un 34,7% de los atropellamientos en Chihuahua ocurre a 300 metros a la redonda de un puente peatonal y que la velocidad vehicular, la distancia de cruce al usar los puentes peatonales y las barreras a nivel de calle son descriptores que contribuyen de manera significativa en los riesgos viales que afrontan los transeúntes. Se concluye que en la ciudad de Chihuahua los puentes peatonales no contribuyen en la mejora de las condiciones de seguridad vial peatonal.
Abley, S., Turner, S. y Singh, R. (2011). Predicting walkability. IPENZ Transportation Group Conference.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Andrade-Ochoa, S., Chaparro-Gómez, V. I., Martínez-García, E. E., y Pérez-Fuentes, F. R. (2020). Evaluación de puentes peatonales de la ciudad de Chihuahua, México. Planeo, 90, 1-13.
Arias Gallegos, W. L. (2012). Motivos del desuso de puentes peatonales en Arequipa. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 38(1), 84-97.
Barrios, H. H., Ríos, I. F. H., y León, C. A. (2021). Propiedades dinámicas y condiciones de servicio de puentes peatonales en México. Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica, (106), 112-135.
Cantillo, V., Arellana, J., y Rolong, M. (2015). Modelling pedestrian crossing behaviour in urban roads: A latent variable approach. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.008
Consejo Nacional para la Prevención de Accidentes. (2018). Informe sobre la situación de la seguridad vial, México. Secretaría de Salud.
D'Orso, G. y Migliore, M. (2020). A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102555
Echeverry, A., Mera, J. J., Villota, J., y Zárate, L. C. (2005). Actitudes y comportamientos de los peatones en los sitios de alta accidentalidad en Cali. Colombia Médica, 36(2), 79-84.
Evans, D. y Norman, P. (2003). Predicting adolescent pedestrians’ road-crossing intentions: an application and extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Health Education Research, 18(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyf023
Frank, L. D., Andresen, M. A., y Schmid, T. L. (2004). Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.011
Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., y Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976725
Gebel, K., Bauman, A., y Owen, N. (2009). Correlates of non-concordance between perceived and objective measures of walkability. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9098-3
Hasan, R., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., y Napiah, M. (2020). An intercept study of footbridge users and non-users in Malaysia. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 73, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.011
Hidalgo-Solórzano, E., Campuzano-Rincón, J., Rodríguez-Hernández, J. M., Chias-Becerril, L., Reséndiz-López, H., Sánchez-Restrepo, H., y Híjar, M. (2010). Motivos de uso y no uso de puentes peatonales en la Ciudad de México: la perspectiva de los peatones. Salud Pública de México, 52(6), 502-510.
Huemer, A. K. (2018). Motivating and deterring factors for two common traffic-rule violations of cyclists in Germany. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.012
Huguenin-Richard, F. y Cloutier, M. S. (2021). A walkability audit tool adapted to the specific population of older pedestrians in urban areas. Flux, (1), 30-53.
Izadpanahi, P., Leao, Z., Lieske, S. N., y Pettit, C. J. (2017, 2-5 julio). Factors motivating bicycling in Sydney: analysing crowdsourced data. 33rd PLEA International Conference Design to Thrive, Scotland, Edinburgh.
Jacobsen, P. L. (2015). Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Injury Prevention, 21(4), 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.3.205rep
Jariot, M. y Montané, J. (2009). Actitudes y velocidad en jóvenes. Aplicación de un programa de educación vial. Relieve, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.15.1.4186
Jirón, P. y Mansilla, P. (2014). Las consecuencias del urbanismo fragmentador en la vida cotidiana de habitantes de la ciudad de Santiago de Chile. EURE, 40(121), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612014000300001
Katopola, D., Mashili, F., y Hasselberg, M. (2022). Pedestrians’ perception of pedestrian bridges—A qualitative study in Dar es Salaam. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031238
Landa-Blanco, M. y Ávila, J. (2020). Factors related to the use of pedestrian bridges in university students of Honduras. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 71, 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.016
Lee, I. M. y Buchner, D. M. (2008). The importance of walking to public health. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(7), S512-S518. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0
Lee, S. M., Conway, T. L., Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., Cain, K. L., y Sallis, J. F. (2017). The relation of perceived and objective environment attributes to neighborhood satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 49(2), 136-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515623823
Lucchesi, S. T., Larranaga, A. M., Ochoa, J. A. A., Samios, A. A. B., y Cybis, H. B. B. (2021). The role of security and walkability in subjective wellbeing: A multigroup analysis among different age cohorts. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 40, 100559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100559
Mackett, R. L. (2001). Policies to attract drivers out of their cars for short trips. Transport Policy, 8(4), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00025-7
Márquez, L. (2015). Análisis de la percepción de seguridad en puentes peatonales: una aproximación mediante modelación híbrida. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, 14(27). https://doi.org/10.22395/rium.v14n27a6
Minguet Medina, J. (2015). Ciudad-consumo. Despolíticas de urbanismo comercial. Dearq Revista de Arquitectura, (17), 14-25.
Nixon, R. (2015). Slow violence, gender, and the environmentalism of the poor. En P. K. Nayar (Ed.), Postcolonial studies: An anthology (pp. 515-532). Wiley.
Nyunt, M. S. Z., Shuvo, F. K., Eng, J. Y., Yap, K. B., Scherer, S., Hee, L. M., Chan, S. P. y Ng, T. P. (2015). Objective and subjective measures of neighborhood environment (NE): relationships with transportation physical activity among older persons. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0276-3
Organización Panamericana de la Salud. (2019). Estado de la seguridad vial en la región de las Américas. Autor. https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/51100/9789275320877_spa.pdf
Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., y Scott-Parker, B. (2017). Footbridge usage in high-traffic flow highways: The intersection of safety and security in pedestrian decision-making. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 49, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.010
Pavan, M., Consonni, V., y Todeschini, R. (2005). Partial ranking models by genetic algorithms variable subset selection (GA-VSS) approach for environmental priority settings. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem, 54(3), 583-609.
Pucher, J., Buehler, R., Bassett, D. R., y Dannenberg, A. L. (2010). Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. American Journal of Public Health, 100(10), 1986-1992. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.189324
Ramadani, H. N., Rahmani, H., y Gazali, A. (2018). Study of efficiency pedestrian bridge crossing in the road of Pangerang Antasari, Banjarmasin. MATEC Web of Conferences, 181, 06009). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818106009
Ratzer, M., Brink, O., Knudsen, L., y Elklit, A. (2014). Posttraumatic stress in intensive care unit survivors–a prospective study. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2(1), 882-898.
Reyes, R. H., Sanchez, G. V., Alanís, J. C. (2019). Población en riesgo: Análisis espacio–temporal de accidentes viales, mediante el uso de herramientas SIG en el municipio de Toluca, estado de México, 2000-2005. GeoFocus Revista Internacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Información Geográfica, (23), 49-69.
Rivera, G., Andrade-Ochoa, S., S Ortega Romero, M., Palos, I., Monge, A., y Enid Sánchez-Torres, L. (2017). Ester of quinoxaline-7-carboxylate 1, 4-di-N-oxide as apoptosis inductors in K-562 cell line: An in vitro, QSAR and DFT study. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, 17(5), 682-691. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520616666160630175927
Rodgers, D. y O’Neill, B. (2012). Infrastructural violence: Introduction to the special issue. Ethnography, 13(4), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138111435738
Rodríguez, J. y Arriagada, C. (2004). Segregación residencial en la ciudad latinoamericana. EURE, 30(89), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612004008900001
Saadati, M., Dorosti, A., Dahim, M., Hemmati, E., Edalatzadeh, M., Hosseinpor, T., y Biparva, A. J. (2020). Listening to pedestrian; What are the influential factors on bridge use? Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-115157/v1
Secretaría de Salud de México. (2020). Boletín epidemiológico sistema nacional de vigilancia epidemiológica sistema único de información. Autor. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/614743/sem53.pdf
Shashank, A. y Schuurman, N. (2019). Unpacking walkability indices and their inherent assumptions. Health & Place, 55, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.005
Shay, E., Spoon, S. C., Khattak, A. J., y Center, S. T. (2003). Walkable environments and walking activity. Southeastern Transportation Center, University of Tennessee.
Smith, L. (2015). Walkability Audit Tool. Workplace Health & Safety, 63(9), 420-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079915595307
Souza, A. C. S., Humberto, M., y Bittencourt, L. (2018). Brazilian women walkability index: Participatory construction of a nationwide index to promote women pedestrian policy in a developing country. Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting.
Todeschini, R., Consonni, V., Mauri, A., Pavan, M., y Leardi, R. (2003). MobyDigs: software for regression and classification models by genetic algorithms. Data Handling in Science and Technology, 23, 141-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-3487(03)23005-7
Wang, H. y Yang, Y. (2019). Neighbourhood walkability: A review and bibliometric analysis. Cities, 93, 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015
Yang, S., Chen, X., Wang, L., Wu, T., Fei, T., Xiao, Q., y Jia, P. (2021). Walkability indices and childhood obesity: A review of epidemiologic evidence. Obesity Reviews, 22, e13096. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13096
Yitzhaki, S. (1983). On an extension of the Gini inequality index. International Economic Review, 617-628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648789
Zareharofteh, F., Hidarnia, A., Morowatisharifabad, M. A., y Eslami, M. (2021). Unsafe behaviours in Iranian adult pedestrians. Journal of Transport & Health, 21, 101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101058